Skip to content

You are looking at the frozen release 2026-09-18. See the latest boards

score: rate on a rubric

Each model reads a chatbot's reply to a prompt and rates how helpful it is on a scale of 5 levels, with a probability for each level. All models get the same 300 replies, 5 times each, and we check every answer against human labels. The replies come from HelpSteer2.

Score vs price

Up and to the left is better. The line joins the best value at each price.

System One LLM

−25−20−15−10−5051015guessing$0.05$0.1$0.2$0.5$1$ per 1k decisions, log scale →Jev: Decision Score 9.2 · $0.036 per 1k decisionsJevGLM-5.3: Decision Score 7.8 · $0.78 per 1k decisionsGLM-5.3Gemini 3.8 Flash: Decision Score 4.6 · $1.3 per 1k decisionsGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Flash: Decision Score −1.4 · $0.13 per 1k decisionsQwen3.8 FlashMercury 2.5: Decision Score −5.5 · $0.034 per 1k decisionsMercury 2.5Mistral Medium 3.5: Decision Score −13.7 · $1.3 per 1k decisionsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Decision Score −19.0 · $0.13 per 1k decisionsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Automation at 95% accuracy

Share of questions each model can answer alone and stay 95% right. It answers only above its confidence cut-off; the rest go to a person.

No model reaches 95% accuracy at any confidence on this task. Keep a person in the loop.

Ranking

System One LLM Baseline

No model clearly beats guessing yet: the top rows can't be told apart from answering with the label base rates.

Ordered by wins (top-2 finishes across score, accuracy, calibration gap, cost and speed), then Decision Score. Select a model for details; select a column header to sort.
ModelWins95% range of the Decision Score
1
Jev
System One TypeSafe AI
3
9.241.3%19.7$0.036670 ms
Accuracy41.3%95% range 35.9–46.9%
Calibration gap19.7 ptslower is better · 0.3% of answers at confidence 1.00
10said 27%, right 47% (34 answers)said 36%, right 31% (118 answers)said 45%, right 31% (261 answers)said 54%, right 31% (339 answers)said 65%, right 41% (324 answers)said 75%, right 53% (222 answers)said 83%, right 61% (157 answers)said 94%, right 76% (45 answers)
Automation at 95%—never reaches 95% accuracy
Speed478 msmedian · p95 670 ms
Stability2.3%of answers change on an identical rerun
Valid output100.0%0.0% refused · 1,500 of 1,500 answered
Setupai-sdk experimental_evaluate ai@7.0.106 · native probabilities via Vercel AI Gateway · reasoning — · temperature — · 300 items × 5 runs · 2026-09-18 · served as typesafe-ai/jevhelpsteer2 run log
=2
GLM-5.3
LLM Z.ai · reasoning low
2
7.843.0%12.9$0.783.6 s
Accuracy43.0%95% range 38.6–47.9%
Calibration gap12.9 ptslower is better · 0.0% of answers at confidence 1.00
10said 35%, right 25% (4 answers)said 44%, right 24% (279 answers)said 52%, right 40% (722 answers)said 61%, right 53% (280 answers)said 71%, right 62% (130 answers)said 83%, right 67% (63 answers)said 92%, right 77% (22 answers)
Automation at 95%—never reaches 95% accuracy
Speed2.2 smedian · p95 3.6 s
Stability31.3%of answers change on an identical rerun
Valid output100.0%0.0% refused · 1,500 of 1,500 answered
Setupjevals-llm 0383a0e3e592 · verbalized probabilities via OpenRouter · Novita (fp8) · reasoning low (mandatory) · temperature provider default · 300 items × 5 runs · 2026-09-18 · served as z-ai/glm-5.3helpsteer2 run log
=2
Mercury 2.5
LLM Inception · no reasoning
2
−5.541.7%31.5$0.0341.2 s
Accuracy41.7%95% range 37.3–46.2%
Calibration gap31.5 ptslower is better · 0.1% of answers at confidence 1.00
10said 31%, right 0% (4 answers)said 43%, right 27% (109 answers)said 52%, right 31% (152 answers)said 62%, right 35% (368 answers)said 72%, right 31% (193 answers)said 84%, right 48% (287 answers)said 94%, right 58% (387 answers)
Automation at 95%—never reaches 95% accuracy
Speed618 msmedian · p95 1.2 s
Stability38.7%of answers change on an identical rerun
Valid output100.0%0.0% refused · 1,500 of 1,500 answered
Setupjevals-llm 0383a0e3e592 · verbalized probabilities via OpenRouter · Inception · reasoning none · temperature provider default · 300 items × 5 runs · 2026-09-18 · served as inception/mercury-2.5helpsteer2 run log
4
Mistral Medium 3.5
LLM Mistral AI · no reasoning
1
−13.743.9%33.6$1.31.2 s
Accuracy43.9%95% range 38.5–49.3%
Calibration gap33.6 ptslower is better · 2.1% of answers at confidence 1.00
10said 40%, right 0% (5 answers)said 60%, right 42% (90 answers)said 70%, right 35% (578 answers)said 80%, right 46% (474 answers)said 91%, right 56% (353 answers)
Automation at 95%—never reaches 95% accuracy
Speed706 msmedian · p95 1.2 s
Stability3.7%of answers change on an identical rerun
Valid output100.0%0.0% refused · 1,500 of 1,500 answered
Setupjevals-llm 0383a0e3e592 · verbalized probabilities via OpenRouter · Mistral · reasoning none · temperature provider default · 300 items × 5 runs · 2026-09-18 · served as mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5helpsteer2 run log
=5
Gemini 3.8 Flash
LLM Google · reasoning low
0
4.642.4%22.6$1.34.0 s
Accuracy42.4%95% range 36.9–47.5%
Calibration gap22.6 ptslower is better · 0.1% of answers at confidence 1.00
10said 44%, right 33% (106 answers)said 53%, right 24% (579 answers)said 64%, right 39% (269 answers)said 71%, right 60% (153 answers)said 84%, right 70% (252 answers)said 93%, right 63% (141 answers)
Automation at 95%—never reaches 95% accuracy
Speed1.9 smedian · p95 4.0 s
Stability11.7%of answers change on an identical rerun
Valid output100.0%0.0% refused · 1,500 of 1,500 answered
Setupjevals-llm 0383a0e3e592 · verbalized probabilities via OpenRouter · Google AI Studio · reasoning low (mandatory) · temperature provider default · 300 items × 5 runs · 2026-09-18 · served as google/gemini-3.8-flashhelpsteer2 run log
—
Label prior
Baseline
—
guessing
0.041.7%0.0——
Accuracy41.7%95% range 36.0–47.0%
Calibration gap0.0 ptslower is better · 0.0% of answers at confidence 1.00
Automation at 95%—no probabilities
Speed—median · p95 —
Stability0.0%of answers change on an identical rerun
Valid output100.0%0.0% refused · 1,500 of 1,500 answered
Setupconstant probabilities · reasoning — · temperature — · 300 items × 5 runs
=5
Qwen3.8 Flash
LLM Alibaba · no reasoning
0
−1.436.1%25.8$0.132.6 s
Accuracy36.1%95% range 31.5–40.7%
Calibration gap25.8 ptslower is better · 0.0% of answers at confidence 1.00
10said 44%, right 23% (232 answers)said 50%, right 27% (353 answers)said 62%, right 34% (594 answers)said 73%, right 48% (46 answers)said 85%, right 62% (151 answers)said 95%, right 60% (124 answers)
Automation at 95%—never reaches 95% accuracy
Speed1.4 smedian · p95 2.6 s
Stability26.0%of answers change on an identical rerun
Valid output100.0%0.0% refused · 1,500 of 1,500 answered
Setupjevals-llm 0383a0e3e592 · verbalized probabilities via OpenRouter · Alibaba · reasoning none · temperature provider default · 300 items × 5 runs · 2026-09-18 · served as qwen/qwen3.8-flashhelpsteer2 run log
=5
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LLM DeepSeek · no reasoning
0
−19.034.7%33.5$0.131.2 s
Accuracy34.7%95% range 30.5–38.7%
Calibration gap33.5 ptslower is better · 1.5% of answers at confidence 1.00
10said 34%, right 9% (11 answers)said 44%, right 16% (102 answers)said 54%, right 22% (351 answers)said 62%, right 28% (346 answers)said 73%, right 34% (267 answers)said 85%, right 54% (261 answers)said 95%, right 60% (162 answers)
Automation at 95%—never reaches 95% accuracy
Speed912 msmedian · p95 1.2 s
Stability34.3%of answers change on an identical rerun
Valid output100.0%0.0% refused · 1,500 of 1,500 answered
Setupjevals-llm 0383a0e3e592 · verbalized probabilities via OpenRouter · DeepSeek · reasoning none · temperature provider default · 300 items × 5 runs · 2026-09-18 · served as deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flashhelpsteer2 run log

Wins: a model wins a column when it is one of the two best in it: the highest score, the highest accuracy, the smallest calibration gap, the lowest price or the fastest speed. Ties count for everyone tied. The table is ordered by wins, then by score; models with as many wins share a place, so =3 means tied for third.

Release 2026-09-18 · suite 0.1.0 · board.json · permalink · explore every question · how we score